Will Boomer Women and Beta Males Be the Bane of Trump?
Share
This election should be a blowout, and maybe it will be, with Trump walking away with Minnesota, New Hampshire, Virginia, and even New Mexico in addition to all the swing states. It’s possible. It could happen. Or not. Kamala Harris, the radical from San Francisco, has used her word salad ways to convince the I-want-to-vote-so-badly-for-Democrats-because-I-hate-Trump crowd that she’s a moderate. She’s tried to contain her cackling ways and has put her own spin on the Biden basement method of campaigning. It’s working.
NEW @maristpoll – Already Voted:
MICHIGAN
Harris 63% (+27)
Trump 36%
.
WISCONSIN
Harris 57% (+14)
Trump 43%
.
PENNSYLVANIA
Harris 63% (+28)
Trump 35% https://t.co/M3rRWuPcgq— Political Polls (@Politics_Polls) November 1, 2024
NEW @maristpoll – Yet to vote:
MICHIGAN
Trump 59% (+21)
Harris 38%
.
WISCONSIN
Trump 53% (+8)
Harris 45%
.
PENNSYLVANIA
Trump 54% (+10)
Harris 44% https://t.co/qjoasC4y1W— Political Polls (@Politics_Polls) November 1, 2024
Women are voting in vast numbers. Men aren’t. Even though men favor Trump by a 57–37 margin, while women back Kamala 55–39, this advantage with men won’t matter if men don’t vote in the numbers women do. It’s going to be closer than it should be, and maybe dangerously close in some key places. Will it be because of illegals voting? That will probably contribute to the tighter numbers. There’s no way to police this or to uncount the votes — especially in places with Democrat secretaries of state. But the bigger problem for Trump and those downballot are boomer women and beta males. (READ MORE from Melissa Mackenzie: The Best Possible Outcome for Democrats: A Trump Win)
Boomers, as a generation, are a disappointment. Half of them are aging hippies and still trying to recover the glory days of Woodstock by abasing themselves in stupid political movements like Black Lives Matters and Climate Action Now. The women of this generation unleashed modern feminism on the populace and deeply desire a female president before they die — no matter how incompetent she may be. Anger and shock that a sure Hillary Clinton win was snatched from their pink pussy hat paws, compounded by the fact that it was taken by an alpha male billionaire, has given women of this generation lots of motivation to vote. And many women are voting early. Pink waves of them.
Is it about abortion? Well, yes. It’s become a sacrament on the left and for “moderate” women, too. But abortion really is the haven of trifling men. It always has been. Men are the beneficiaries of abortion, and dopey women have convinced themselves that abortion helps them. It doesn’t. A woman, no matter what, must live with the consequences of pregnancy. It is in her body, and it’s violence done to her body to kill the baby. It’s a lifelong commitment if she keeps the baby. She cannot escape no matter the promise of abortion. But men? Well, abortion for a hound dog man is a “problem,” as Barack Obama called it, solved. It’s not his body. It’s not his life changed forever either way. This argument, by the way, is used to say men should have no opinion about abortion at all and should, for freedom of choice, vote for abortion. But abortion is the haven of the scoundrel. It lets him avoid any sort of check on his behavior; any limit. A deceived woman finds out the hard way that no matter her “choice” she must live with it, in her soul, for the rest of her life.
The men voting for Kamala Harris are these sort of men. They’re the sort who sniff and grab babies and take inappropriate showers with their daughters. They’re the sort who believe Michelle Obama is right when she says women should lie to and harangue their men into voting for Harris. They’re the sort of men who slap their girlfriends. They’re the sort of men who pressure their women to have abortions. They’re the sort of men who enjoy power differentials and get hummers in the Oval Office, grope the staff, or get the nanny pregnant. They’re the sort who watch a bunch of gay men cosplaying as “real” men in political advertisements and think those guys represent them.
But the more dangerous beta males are the ones who disengage completely. Apathy is the death of a republic and, should men stay home this election season, they’ll tacitly be supporting a woman whose policies will enshrine evils like transgendering children, allowing boys in girls’ locker rooms and sports, and on and on. They’ll be selling out their own children’s futures in deference to the thousands of illegal immigrants. Economic policies will reward the oppressors and take advantage of the oppressed. Taxation will increase, and the younger generation will suffer.
Men should be providers and protectors. It’s their natural inclination. This impulse has been suppressed through propaganda about “toxic masculinity” when the real problem is a lack of masculine men. Meanwhile, the environment has produced men who literally have low testosterone. Lazing around masturbating, playing video games, living with their parents, and giving up on life is no way to be a man, but it’s happening. Is it low testosterone? Is it absorbing the messages about their worthlessness? Who knows? But staying at home and refusing to vote, no matter the man’s age, is a beta move. It takes nearly no effort to vote, and even that is too much energy to expend for a one’s future? The hopelessness becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. (WATCH: The Spectacle Ep. 162: The Not-So-Secret Sexual Deviancy of the Left)
Now, just because women are out-voting men doesn’t mean they’re all voting for Kamala. They’re not. But men need to be voting, too, because single women vote D+37. One doesn’t have to be stats genius to know that if twice as many single women as single men vote, well, it’s over for Trump. The difference can’t be made up with married women (who vote Republican) or black men or anyone else.
Exit question: If Donald Trump loses, will the campaign regret ticking off their evangelical base on abortion in an attempt to win moderates who are moving to Kamala now that she’s convinced them that she’s not the San Fran radical she is? Republican politicians have a long history of crapping on their base. If they get elected, they usually wait until after they’re in office to reveal their contempt and treat their base like garbage. But when the Republican base senses that their candidate hates them, that candidate loses. In case you doubt that, remember John McCain and Mitt Romney. Both tried to be Dem-lite, and both lost.
Donald Trump won in 2016 on promises to stop illegal immigration, bring back the economy, and promote a pro-life, pro-America agenda. The goal was to Make America Great Again. Even with all the rallies and the big shows of support, do Americans understand that a Trump presidency will relieve them of their inflation misery? Do they know that the country will quit moving to the debauched left and more toward sanity? Will the promise of a streamlined Elon Musk bureaucracy and a RFK Jr.-led health initiative and no wars inspire voters? All of them?
Do the promises of a Trump presidency excite the right people, the people who vote? Here’s to hoping. A Harris presidency would accelerate the decline of America, but maybe too many don’t care. If that’s the case, Americans get the country they vote for — or more likely, the one they sat on the couch for.
READ MORE:
Five Quick Things: Kamala’s Yankee-Style Scary Halloween Meltdown
